Toh 1091 — In Praise of the Goddess Revatī
Translated by Catherine Dalton under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha
In Praise of the Goddess Revatī
F.255.b Homage to the Three Jewels.
Homage to noble, glorious Vajrapāṇi.
Homage to the great goddess Rematī.[1]
namo vajrapāṇisya cili cili bhindi bhindi muñca muñca muñca havalakana svāhā| vajrapāṇīr ajñāpayati svāhā| deva samājñāpayati svāhā| rīṣayaḥ samājñāpayati svāhā|[3]
namo ratna trayāya| tadyathā| ruru viṣiṣṭhava dhotsi svāhā||
Notes
The goddess’s name is here transliterated in Tibetan as Rematī (re ma ti), a name that occurs in several Tibetan canonical and noncanonical works. However, the only attested version of the present goddess’s name in Sanskrit sources is Revatī. As discussed in the introduction to this translation, the goddess Rematī mentioned in a number of canonical and noncanonical Tibetan works appears to be distinct from the goddess or graha Revatī. Although we believe the use of the name Rematī here is in error and should be Revatī, we retained Rematī in the English translation to accurately reflect the Tibetan source text. For more information on Rematī, see the introduction to Praising the Lady Who Rules Disease (Toh 1090).
backIn Tibetan the name Revatī is followed by a plural particle (dag), which we have chosen not to translate. A similar passage in Toh 746http://read.84000.co/translation/toh746.html reads “Revatī, your family…” (nam gru khyod kyi cho ’grang) as Vajrapāṇi is addressing Revatī directly.
backThe dhāraṇī or vidyāmantra up to this point is found in both The Great Tantra of Supreme Knowledge (Toh 746)http://read.84000.co/translation/toh746.html and The Dhāraṇī of the Goddess Revatī (IOL Tib J 442/2). The remainder of the dhāraṇī is not found in either work.
backHere, as in the homage, the Tibetan text reads Rematī (re ma ti), though as reflected in the text’s title, and explained in introduction, it should read Revatī.
backThese same epithets are used to describe Rematī (not Revatī) in Toh 670, 671, 672, 840, 842, and Toh 1090/1777. http://read.84000.co/translation/toh840.htmlhttp://read.84000.co/translation/toh842.html We presume that the redactors who conflated the names Revatī and Rematī here also included these epithets in the colophon.
back